|
You were the
national champion in 1973, and the first to be in Malaysia. When did
you stop playing? What made you do so?
YAM Tunku : I stopped playing squash in the mid-80s. I can’t
remember exactly when, but the reason was that I was too busy, and had
some injuries; ankle and knee problems. I had a hip operation last
year, which is probably due to the wear and tear I got on the squash
courts. And I was getting a little bit overweight, so I thought it was
probably better for me to not continue.
I heard about your passion for cricket. What
about the sport fascinates you?
YAM Tunku : Which one? Cricket? Cricket, it’s almost a
philosophy. That’s what I like about cricket…so many dimensions in the
game. It’s not only a team sport, but also an individual sport. You
can be any size, any shape, any weight to play cricket. It’s a game of
pure skill, and that’s one of the attractions of the game, cricket.
So, basically in cricket…size doesn’t matter!
YAM Tunku : Size doesn’t matter, no. Some of the best players
in history have been small people. Sir Don Bradman, he was very small.
The current no.1 batsman in the world, Sachin Tendulkar from India,
he’s very short. You have the phenomenon in 1995, when Sri Lanka
became the world champion. A lot of those people in the team are
smaller than the Malaysians! So, it’s a bit like squash. Size is not
important, it’s the skill that is important, and of course, squash is
the added fitness and the mental side of things that are also
important. Look at our two former world junior champions, Nicol David
and Ong Beng Hee, they’re not big people. The current world champion,
Peter Nicol, he’s not very big either. So, squash in that sense is
similar. Anyone can play, and in fact if you’re too big, it can be
difficult for you because of the turnings and those other aspects.
What are your views of Malaysian Squash; past,
present and future?
YAM Tunku : The past was very much pioneering base. Squash is
relatively young in this country. The national association was formed
in 1972. Before then, squash enthusiasm was in the clubs. One of the
reasons why a group of us got together and decided to form the
national association was to try and move the game forward. So, the
early years in squash were very much to do with the growth and
development of the game. There were 20 squash courts in 1972, by 1980
there were already 400 squash courts in the country. The growth was
incredible! I don’t know how many there are now, but it moved pass 700
and probably now closer to 1,000. We brought in our first national
coach, Chris Clark in the early 80s, and established the junior
development program. We realized that we really needed to get the
juniors playing if we were going to get anywhere. We established
leagues, circuits, and a lot of competitions…both the senior and
junior level. Then, squash sort of built up. Presently, we have
excelled at the junior level, having created two world junior
champions, but now the challenge is very much on where we go from
here. At the senior level, we are still unable to get into those top 3
or 4 countries because the depth is still not there. We have a good
no.1 in the men’s, and now a good no.2 with Azlan, but in order to
carry that forward into good international results, we need good no.3,
4, 5 and 6. So, the future for Malaysian squash is to continue at the
grass roots, and ensure that the junior program continues. What we
need to do is have a much tougher league for the national players,
where they are playing not only good players from Malaysia but also
foreigners. So, we either get a system or a program, where foreigners
continually play the game in this country just like the squash leagues
in England, or our top players have really got to go and train
overseas, like Beng Hee, Nicol and Azlan are, spending more time
overseas in the international competitions. We also need more
professionals in the game, and I think we should see the results in
the future. But that’s obviously easier said than done because
overseas, funding comes into it. There’s not a lot of money in
professional squash, but a lot of commitment, and certainly a lot of
dedication.
Squash
development in Malaysia is very much club based due to the lack of
facilities in schools. We would like to request assistance from the
Olympic Council of Malaysia to propose constructions of squash courts
in new schools to the Ministry of Education. Your comment please?
YAM Tunku : There’s no point in building squash courts in
schools, unless the Ministry of Education are committed in developing
the game in those schools. Most schools have football pitches, but the
football pitches aren’t being used for football. So, it would actually
be a waste of money if that were to happen, schools would have the
courts and not really utilize it. In Australia, it is the courts in
clubs that are being utilized for junior development. Actually, courts
are not needed in schools. What you need is to have clubs being
available to keen school children to be able to play squash. For
instance, schools in an area like Subang Jaya want to play in a
league. You can have the school league based in a club like Lake View.
So, with courts available to schools, they can use it for school
activities. That’s the model they should be working on, utilizing the
existing courts around the country, and then building on to a program
for schools. We’ll obviously assist SRAM to get courts in schools, but
that will entail a big program for the schools as they have many
sports to cater for as well. There are 43 sports under OCM. If we have
to facilitate for every sport, that will sum up to billions and
billions of dollars! SRAM has done well without school courts. They
can continue to do well by ensuring squash activities are held by the
schools. Schools should be encouraged to form squash clubs and squash
teams, by organizing regular competitions or a league for whatever
form or standard among other schools in that area, or the schools
themselves can have an inter-school or inter house event, three or
four times a week. Maybe on Saturday mornings, they can have other
activities. The good thing about squash is that it’s played in a very
short period of time. You don’t need the whole day to play squash.
During school hours, the courts are empty because kids are in lessons.
So, that’s not a particularly good utilization of those courts. The
better thing is for those in the morning school session, book courts
in the afternoon at the center, and the afternoon session book courts
in the morning. So, I think a school’s program is important, but it
doesn’t necessarily mean that you must have courts in schools. |